![]() The search feature is graphic intensive, with a more open and inviting interface than iTunes. When you need more music, Zune sells it via their Marketplace portal. The layout is stylish and easy to understand, and quickly devours the competition-importing your iTunes library so you remain loyal to the Zune brand. Thankfully, once Zune 3.0 is installed, it’s a fast runner. Except when its not: Zune 3.0 wouldn’t install on my laptop PC, and it took 20-30 minutes to finish on my older, Windows XP-based desktops. After that, it’s merely a trip to Zune’s webpage for the free software. ![]() Microsoft recommends running Windows Update before downloading the Zune 3.0 software, which is time consuming depending on the age and condition of your PC. While all of the above is remedied by hacks, installing Zune’s (mandatory) software is similarly complicated. And it cannot double as a USB storage device. Which, considering their fashionably late entrance, makes the Microsoft Zune a tough sell.īack to that industry standard: seasoned MP3 veterans know the Zune does not talk to iTunes, Windows Media Player or any Macintosh computer. Considering Microsoft’s dominance stemming from the personal computer revolution, the Zune’s unique value proposition is less like the corporate mothership and more like the original Apple Macintosh: isolating and challenging. But there’s a problem: Zune distances itself from the industry standard software and hardware systems. The Microsoft Zune prides itself in being the only significant alternative to Apple’s wildly popular iPod and iTunes duo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |